About Me

Name: Alexander Koby
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Facebook Explains "McCain/Palin '08" Fan Page Removal

Friends,

(I'm starting to sound like Joe Lieberman)

When John McCain announced Sarah Palin as his running mate, I quickly created a "McCain/Palin '08" Group to begin gathering support for the ticket. Following Facebook's advice, it was suggested that I create a Fan Page as well, which would allow more options and features for users. So, I focused my efforts on promoting the "McCain/Palin '08" Fan Page instead.

As of Sept. 16, the "McCain/Palin '08" Fan Page, which had attracted over 200,000 supporters, was taken down by Facebook. No warning was given, no explanation was sent to its members; the Page simply disappeared. I received a notice informing me that I or the Page had violated one or more of these generic terms of use.

It read:

Warning - Please Read This!

You created a Page that has violated our Terms of Use, and this Page has been removed. Facebook Pages are special profiles used solely for commercial, political, or charitable purposes. Among other things, Pages that are hateful, threatening, or obscene are not allowed. We also take down Pages that attack an individual or group, or that are set up by an unauthorized individual. Continued misuse of Facebook's features could result in your account being disabled.
 
Being unsure of which generic guideline Facebook was referring to, I requesting a more specific answer clarifying the exact term they felt was broken. I received a reply from Facebook stating, in summary, that I (Alexander Koby) am not an "authorized representative" of the individual or group being promoted and thereby had violated Facebook's terms of use.
 
The entire E-mail reads:
Hi Alexander,

Per our Terms of Use, Facebook Pages may only be set up by an authorized representative of the entity or individual that is the subject of the Facebook Page. If a Page is created by an unauthorized individual, this Page may be removed. If an authorized representative requests it, the fans of an unofficial Page may be moved over to the official Page before it is removed. Because we respect the privacy of all users, I'm not able to give you any specific information about another user's removed Page. Please note, however, that the official, authorized Pages for John McCain and Sarah Palin are still available on the site.

Our view is that Facebook should not play the arbiter of any discussion that occurs through our site. We apply this view to any political discourse through any of our products, including Facebook Pages and Ads. By censoring certain messages while allowing others, we would risk damaging the very discussion that we designed our products to create. We will never remove a Page in order to censor the content or promote a differing opinion.

We do take down Pages that attack an individual or group or that promote or glorify violence, intolerance, racism or discrimination.

If you have any questions or concerns, you can visit the Terms Applicable to Facebook Pages at http://www.facebook.com/terms_pages.php.

Thanks for contacting Facebook,

Claire
Customer Operations
Facebook
The explanation keeps reverting back to threats and hate speech, none of which were endorsed or promoted by the Page. It was a "Fan Page," hence calling for support of something positive. On the other hand, we all know that people are going to make comments and start verbal fights; that's a given. It then falls to the administrator and community members alike to remove or report these unsavory postings, though some things are undoubtedly bound to slip through the cracks.

Considering the Page developed a substantial fan base, I would like to see it reactivated. However, since Facebook allows me no means of contacting either the John McCain or Sarah Palin Fan Page Admins directly to request authorization, I have made a few postings and replied to Facebook seeking further assistance instead.

Perhaps one of the McCain staffers will write me a permission slip.

Nevertheless, I am surprised at how hastily this Page was taken down, barely lasting 2 weeks. We have all seen highly obnoxious Groups on Facebook, and for as often as you may report them for being offensive, they are rarely taken down, if ever.

Case in point: A few years back, some coworkers created a Group mocking a silly comment another had made. It was all in good fun and no one was "offended" by it, not even the commenter who was a member. However, to the unsuspecting passerby, it could have been interpreted as hateful or cruel. As time passed, the group dwindled and a fickle third-part became the Admin. I left the group too, but for some reason, my name was in the description of this Group and every time you ran a search for me on Facebook, this Group popped up. Since the new Admin was unresponsive, it took me 2 years of reporting and letter writing before Facebook finally acted in taking the Group down. Hardly a consistent policy.

In the meantime, the "McCain/Palin '08" Group seems to violate no terms and has been left alone.

# # #

(a.k. 09.20.08)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You need to Pay Koby's Medical Expenses

(Warning: Highly blunt in the typical Koby fashion.)

Today, September 11, 2008 marks 14 straight months of cancer treatment. 14 months of being in Texas, 14 months of doctor's visits, numerous hospital stays averaging 2 weeks a piece, 20 chemotherapy infusions, transfusions, a rollercoaster of blood counts, and a surgery for good measure. I am tired of being in limbo. I am tired of the endurance test and being in Texas. I am tired of weekly trips to the clinic. But and most of all, I am tired of dealing with my medical expenses. So, without your permission, I would like to hand them over to you. You shouldn't mind.

This year's presidential candidates have offered multistep plans which will be the answer to my prayers.

In the last 14 months, my medical costs have accrued to more than $1.2 million. Granted, I have insurance, but I grow wary of receiving those notices in the mail. It would be so much easier if someone, like you, could pick up the slack. After all this is what so many Americans are begging for.

Before World War II, no one expected their employer to handle health care concerns. As battles raged in Europe and domestic resources were running thin, companies offered to compensate worker with medical benefits rather than additional wages. However as tensions abroad simmered, the dependency for passing the buck has increased generation after generation. With the modern medical age, the old system is woefully outdated. Folks are expecting more and more benefits without accounting for neither inflation nor scarcity of resources.

Having a unique knowledge of medical affairs, I feel fully prepared to give you a more than adequate proposal as to why you should accommodate my health care needs. The only thing is, I don't have the gumption to ask you directly for this favor, because it's not like I'm asking to borrow a few bucks for lunch. No, I was thinking more in the thousands, of your earnings. Thus, I will employ a bully, who will use the threat of force, to collect this debt. Though, Uncle Sam considers it more of a donation, since these are monies that you will never see again anyway. Why should you sit in luxury while I struggle to make ends meet? You will see Sam at work, he will visit your house, and he will follow you to a department store. Like I said, I am too passive-aggressive to tell you this outright, but I want you to give until it hurts, because I need it more than you. Only then will it be fair.

I also demand to continue treatment at the best facility in the world. I demand preferential treatment for tests and therapies over those who are older and/or sicklier than I; after all, I am a better investment for long-term survival. I was also born on American soil, and must receive priority over foreigners or illegals with life threatening injuries. However, in 2007 The AMA reported $96 billion in lost revenue for services that went to treat illegal aliens. You should pay that too. Even better, in all likelihood, they will be in line ahead of you; but I don't have to worry. Remember, that under the umbrella of socialized medicine, there is only one health care provider who decides all treatment requests. The government. Simple, right?

Recalling Hillary Clinton's health "security" plan, which Obama has taken a shine to, the fine print was ignored my many of the anchor chair analysts. For instance, if you, a private citizen, needed to have a procedure done, that did not receive financial approval from the government, and you offered to pay a private physician (perhaps an acquaintance) out of your own pocket to perform the operation, both of you could be held liable and be facing criminal charges.

Day after day, Barack Obama says that "we," as Americans, who are struggling, who rise and fall together -- that "we" should embrace personal responsibility in assisting our fellow man, instead of always focusing on "your" needs first. Shane on you. He is also making promises that he would like to rebuild Africa, Haiti and New Orleans. I am confused. Besides, the ladder portion of your strategy doesn't interest me in the least, Senator. I don't care if 47 million people are "living" in the United States lack health insurance. I don't know them, it's not my problem is their kid needs braces or grandmother needs a new hip. As a victim, I am concerned about me, first and foremost. My own skin, my vitality. I don't care if you run a small business and have to cut employment. I don't care if you can't afford air conditioning, gasoline, cell phones and cable. You should be prepared to make sacrifices.

On the other hand, John McCain says those living in the United States should be responsible for their own health care. Plus, he neglects to mention whether or not you need to be a citizen to qualify. McCain also says that, "Americans Are Worried About Health Care Costs." With the democrat's plan, "I" wouldn't be worried about any costs, because I wouldn't be receiving the bills. "McCain will also reform The Tax Code (really, all 30,000 pages?) to offer more choices beyond Employer-Based Health Insurance Coverage. While still having the option of employer-based coverage, every family will receive a direct refundable tax credit - effectively cash - of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families to offset the cost of insurance." An actual quote. Distribute cash cards? Just like after Hurricane Katrina? You seriously expect people to put this money toward health care? That "direct rebate" is going to Best Buy for a 62" Plasma TV. Tell me I'm wrong.

With all of this in mind, I know you are more than eager to break out your cheque books and take care of this little favor for me. In fact, your voter identification cards are a better alternative. After all, I know you're good for it.

# # #

(a.k. 09.11.08)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Between Barack and a Birthplace

Perhaps you ran across this story tucked away in the depths of a local newspaper or streamed across your daily news feed. At any rate, I felt compelled to address this issue.

There has been a buzz recently concerning the authenticity of Sen. Barack Obama's and Sen. John McCain's birth certificates. As you know, being a "natural-born citizen" is a prerequisite to taking the oath of the presidency.

With a little digging, it became clear that even though McCain was born in Panama, it was to naturally-born American parents and occurred within the borders of a U.S. [military] controlled zone of the canal -- qualifying as "American soil." Okay, acceptable.

However, the legitimacy of Obama's birth record remains cloudy. There have been rumors that the document has been forged, in addition to there being evidence of multiple copies denoting his birth taking place at two different Hawaiian hospitals.

Doing my own "e-search," it is difficult to find a credible source that does not blatantly inject its own "spin" to the story. Two lines into an article, spotting keywords within the subtext such as "liberal media conspiracy" and "lunacy from the Christian right," it becomes painstakingly apparent which direction the author has taken. Other unreliable bloggers side-step their premise entirely and trail off into their own sporadically rambling tangents -- thus proving only one theory: that they fail to grasp a keen understanding toward the mechanics of the English language.

Nevertheless, the Insider released a report stating that, "His presumed Kenyan-born father was foreign-born, and his mother was too young at the time of birth to confer natural born status by virtue of her American citizenship. Thus his citizenship comes down to proving he was born in the USA, and his campaign has staked its credibility on the authenticity of the Daily Kos-derived birth certificate image."

According to Hawaiian law and unlike most other states, birth certificates are not public record and are only available upon request to family members. In early June, after numerous requests, the Obama campaign finally released a copy of the certificate; immediately sparking controversy. Various fact finders and news outlets have professed their findings with numerous revisions. Claiming that the document is the work of a would-be "Photoshopper," or a legitimate product of a Kinko's quick-copy.

In this day and age, with toasters & YouTube, and with personal views & grievances aside, can we please locate definitive, unwavering, paperwork and testimony that we can all agree on beyond a shadow of a doubt? Must we be subjected to hear-say from a friend of a friend, shoddy mimeographs and lack of official seals? All of which so obviously begs for speculation.

In related news, Philip Berg, a Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter, has filed suit against Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.

Will all of this go anywhere? Perhaps, perhaps not.

I am neither a certified forgery expert nor do I have vast experience with comparative analysis. I can however, as can you, formulate my own conclusions based on the information at hand while factoring in the interpretations of others. What troubles me more than the authenticity of a birth certificate, is the notion that too many Americans are willing to shrug-off requirements such as natural-born citizenship; saying, "Well, does it really matter?" The further we move away from the original framework of the constitution, adding our own insights and amendments, the more dangerous and opinionated our interpretations become.

This leaves me wondering: Will we ever "honestly" play by the rules, or continue to make them up as we go along -- each adding our own "spin."

# # #

(a.k. 06.26.08)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »